- Professor Dr. Mohammad Tariqur Rahman on Happy birthday celebration, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Regret on Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
- Lee Rudolph on Drug scientists trip up, lifting paper that is meth compose one on LSD
We’re on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
Pleased birthday, Retraction Watch: We’re turning nine
Nine years back this Saturday that is coming August 3, 2010, we published a post, “Why write a weblog about retractions?”
Just exactly just What has grown to become clear when you look at the intervening nine years is exactly what a vein that is rich are as tales of what are the results whenever one thing goes incorrect in technology. And also as we now have done each year at the moment, we’ll review just just what took place within the last few one year.
Drug researchers trip up, raising paper that is meth write one on LSD
Evidently meth is just a gateway medication … for publishing misconduct.
Scientists in Asia have forfeit a 2019 paper as to how LSD could harm eyesight because they’d lifted a lot of the paper from a write-up which had showed up the season before in a journal that is different about methamphetamine.
The article that is retracted “Long-term systemic therapy with lysergic acid diethylamide causes retinal harm in CD1 mice,” starred in Human & Experimental Toxicology. In line with the article:
Writers object as “doubtful” information doom dermatology paper
A dermatology log has retracted a 2017 article by a couple of scientists in Saudi Arabia after finding a “serious complaint” about the integrity associated with the information. However the author that is first of paper pressed right straight back, saying the move had been unjustified.
This article, “Successful usage of mixed corticosteroids and rituximab in an individual with refractory cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa,” had been published by Ibrahim Al-Homood and Mohammad Aljahlan, rheumatologists at King Fahad health City in Riyadh and starred in the Journal of Dermatology & Dermatologic Surgical treatment. It described (with instead grisly images) the way it is of a man that is 25-year-old serious leg ulcers that fixed after the described combination treatment.
But in the notice describes, the paper can’t be trusted:
Kyoto University suspends very first writer of retracted Kumamoto quake paper
1st composer of a paper that is now-retracted technology in regards to the aftereffects of the life-threatening 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan happens to be suspended from their college place for starters 12 months.
Intending Lin, associated with Department of Geophysics at Kyoto University, had been sanctioned by the organization for misconduct stemming from his misuse of information and plagiarism within the 2016 paper:
Sunday checks out: A sleuth whoever work has generated a huge selection of retractions and modifications; an “unethical, high-risk and deceptive eye that is; genetics’ high retraction price
Before we provide this week’s sunday Reads, a concern: Do you really enjoy our weekly roundup? If that’s the case, we’re able to actually make use of your assistance. Can you look at a tax-deductible contribution to help sunday Reads, and our everyday work? Thanks ahead of time.
Forensics Friday: can you flag this paper if it had been under review?
Ever desired to hone your talent as being a systematic sleuth? Now’s your opportunity.
Due to the United states Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB), which can be invested in educating writers on guidelines in publishing, figure planning, and reproducibility, we’re presenting the tenth in a string, Forensics Friday.
Take a good look at the image below, and then just just simply take our poll. From then on, click the website website link below to learn the answer that is right.
Cock and bull tale contributes to retraction of bovine herpesvirus paper
The ancients possessed a plain thing for hybrids (think pets, perhaps not vehicles): half goat-half people, horses with peoples torsos, winged horses and lions, you will get the image. But a mix that is chicken-cown’t on that list … until now.
A small grouping of researchers in Brazil has lost a paper in a veterinary log for wanting to reuse information from a poultry research within their paper on herpesvirus infections in cattle.
This article, “Bovine Herpesvirus 5 promotes mitochondrial disorder in cultured bovine monocyte-derived macrophages and never influence virus replication,” starred in February into the journal Veterinary Microbiology.
‘Not biologically plausible’: questions about survey information make fluorosis paper a banner
A article that is recent provided a stark caution in regards to the dangers to young ones of fluoride within the nation’s water happens to be tagged with a manifestation of concern following the publication of a fresh paper which undermines the dependability associated with the initial information.
The article, “Dental fluorosis trends in US dental health surveys: 1986 to 2012,” starred in March in JDR Clinical & Translational analysis, a journal that is dental. The very first write my paper author on the paper is Christopher Neurath, associated with the United states Environmental wellness Studies Project, which advocates against fluoridation of water.
This article, that used information through the nationwide health insurance and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) when it comes to years 2011 and 2012, reported “large increases in extent and prevalence” of fluorosis over that period — continuing a trend dating back to to your mid-1980s.
In line with the scientists:
Gravitational areas, silkworm excrement, and “putor” programs: just just exactly How did this “pure, utter nonsense” go into in a peer-reviewed log?
Often, a paper arrives this is certainly therefore revolutionary, it defies description. So as opposed to attempt to do justice to a paper that is recent Parasitology Research, we’ll replicate a couple of paragraphs right here:
Leech paper nets phrase of concern
A write-up claiming to uproot the evolutionary tree of leeches has gotten a manifestation of concern after having an audience notified the log about possible difficulties with the information.
The content, “Phylogenomic analysis of the putative link that is missing reinterpretation of leech development,” appeared online in Genome Biology and Evolution, an Oxford University Press name, on June 19 of the 12 months. In line with the writers — a team that is international includes researchers during the nationwide Museum of Natural History, the new york Museum of Natural Sciences, Florida State University and University of Gothenburg in Sweden — their results: